Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Chairman's Message
Director’s Message
Editorial
Original Article
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Review Article
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Chairman's Message
Director’s Message
Editorial
Original Article
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Review Article
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
5 (
2
); 136-137
doi:
10.25259/DJIGIMS_6_2026

Enhancement of Buccolingual Ridge Width Using Calcium Phosphosilicate Graft: A 10-Month Follow-Up Case Report

Department of Periodontology, Kurunji Venkatramana Gowda Dental College, Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka, India

*Corresponding author: Sarvapradha Sriram Sathyanarayanamurthy, Department of Periodontology, Kurunji Venkatramana Gowda Dental College, Kurunjibhag, Sullia, Dakshina Kannada, 574327, Karnataka, India. anuswarakanthraj@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Dayakar MM, Kanthraj A, Sathyanarayanamurthy SS. Enhancement of Buccolingual Ridge Width Using Calcium Phosphosilicate Graft: A 10-Month Follow-Up Case Report. Dent J Indira Gandhi Int Med Sci. 2026;5:134-7. doi: 10.25259/DJIGIMS_6_2026.

Abstract

Adequate alveolar ridge width is essential for successful prosthetically driven implant rehabilitation. Horizontal ridge deficiencies following tooth extraction often require augmentation procedures before implant placement. This case report describes the management of a horizontally deficient alveolar ridge in a 50-year-old female patient in relation to the maxillary left second premolar region (tooth 25). Clinical and radiographic examination revealed inadequate buccolingual ridge width. Horizontal ridge augmentation was performed using calcium phosphosilicate bioactive glass putty (NovaBone®) following recipient-site decortication. Clinical evaluation at 10-month follow-up demonstrated an increase in ridge width from approximately 3 mm to 5 mm. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) confirmed satisfactory horizontal bone gain, ridge contour, and stability. Within the limitations of a single case report, calcium phosphosilicate bioactive glass putty combined with recipient-site decortication demonstrated a predictable and minimally invasive approach for horizontal ridge augmentation prior to implant rehabilitation.

Keywords

Alveolar ridge augmentation
Bioactive glass
CBCT
Horizontal ridge deficiency
Nova Bone®

INTRODUCTION

The alveolar bone is a specialized structure whose integrity depends on the presence of teeth and functional loading transmitted through the periodontal ligament.[1] Following tooth extraction, the alveolar ridge undergoes physiologic remodeling characterized by progressive resorption.[2] Horizontal bone loss has been shown to exceed vertical bone loss, particularly affecting the buccal cortical plate, resulting in a narrow alveolar ridge.[3,4]

Adequate alveolar ridge width is critical for successful prosthetic and implant rehabilitation.[5] Insufficient buccolingual bone volume may compromise implant positioning and increase the risk of biological and mechanical complications.[6] Consequently, ridge augmentation procedures are often required prior to implant placement.[7]

Post-extraction resorption is the most common cause of horizontal ridge deficiency and is attributed to loss of periodontal ligament-mediated blood supply and remodeling of the bundle bone.[3] Additional factors such as periodontal disease, traumatic extraction, periapical pathology, and long-standing edentulism further contribute to ridge resorption.[8]

Several techniques have been proposed for horizontal ridge augmentation, including guided bone regeneration, ridge splitting, block grafts, and particulate grafting.[9] The choice of graft material significantly influences regenerative outcomes.[10] Synthetic alloplastic grafts offer advantages such as biocompatibility, unlimited availability, and elimination of donor-site morbidity.[11]

Calcium phosphor silicate bioactive glass (Nova Bone®) is an alloplastic graft material with osteoconductive and osteostimulation properties.[12] It forms a hydroxycarbonate apatite layer on contact with body fluids, promoting osteoblastic activity and new bone formation.[13] Decortication of the recipient site further enhances regeneration by inducing the regional acceleratory phenomenon.[14]

This case report describes horizontal ridge augmentation using calcium phosphor silicate bioactive glass putty with clinical and CBCT evaluation over a 10-month follow-up period.

CASE REPORT

Patient information

A 50-year-old female patient reported to the Department of Periodontology with a chief complaint of a missing tooth in relation to the maxillary left second premolar (tooth 25), associated with functional and aesthetic concerns.

The medical history revealed bronchial asthma under medical management for 5 years, which was well controlled. Dental history revealed the extraction of tooth 25, 7 years earlier, due to caries, with no ridge preservation performed at the time of extraction.

Clinical examination

Intraoral examination revealed a partially edentulous space in relation to tooth 25 with a visibly narrow buccolingual ridge [Figure 1]. Ridge height was clinically adequate, and the overlying soft tissues were healthy. Adjacent teeth were periodontally stable.

Pre-operative image showing reduced buccolingual ridge width.
Figure 1: Pre-operative image showing reduced buccolingual ridge width.

Radiographic evaluation (CBCT)

Preoperative CBCT evaluation revealed a buccolingual ridge width of ~3 mm at the crestal level [Figure 2], confirming the presence of a horizontal ridge deficiency and the need for augmentation prior to implant placement.

Preoperative CBCT (Cone beam computed tomography) image showing reduced buccolingual ridge width of approximately 3 mm at the crestal level
Figure 2: Preoperative CBCT (Cone beam computed tomography) image showing reduced buccolingual ridge width of approximately 3 mm at the crestal level

Diagnosis

Partially edentulous maxillary left second premolar region with horizontal alveolar ridge deficiency.

Treatment plan

  • Horizontal ridge augmentation using calcium phosphor silicate bioactive glass putty (Nova Bone®)

  • Recipient-site decortication

  • Periodic clinical and radiographic follow-up

  • Planned future implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation

Written informed consent was obtained prior to treatment.

Surgical procedure

Following completion of the Phase I periodontal therapy, surgery was performed under aseptic conditions. Local anesthesia was administered, and a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated to expose the alveolar ridge. Initial buccolingual ridge width was measured using a periodontal probe and confirmed to be ~3 mm.

Decortication of the recipient site was performed using a round bur under copious saline irrigation to induce bleeding points. Calcium phosphor silicate bioactive glass putty (Nova Bone®) was then placed over the decorticated ridge to achieve horizontal augmentation [Figures 3 and 4]. The flap was repositioned and sutured to obtain primary closure. Postoperative instructions and medications were prescribed.

Flap elevation and decortication done
Figure 3: Flap elevation and decortication done
Placement of calcium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (NOVA Bone)
Figure 4: Placement of calcium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (NOVA Bone)

Follow-up and results

Postoperative healing was uneventful. The patient reported for review at 10 months due to the inability to attend intermediate follow-up visits. Clinical examination revealed healthy soft tissues and a well-contoured alveolar ridge.

Buccolingual ridge width was clinically measured and found to be ~5 mm, representing a net horizontal gain of 2 mm [Figure 5]. Follow-up CBCT imaging confirmed the increase in ridge width with satisfactory bone density and ridge stability, rendering the site suitable for mini-implant placement [Figure 6].

Post-operative image showing increased buccolingual ridge width
Figure 5: Post-operative image showing increased buccolingual ridge width
Post-operative cone-beam computed tomography after 10 months
Figure 6: Post-operative cone-beam computed tomography after 10 months

DISCUSSION

Resorption of the alveolar ridge following tooth extraction is a well-documented biological phenomenon and a major limitation in implant dentistry. Newman et al. emphasized that loss of the periodontal ligament eliminates functional stimulation to the alveolar bone, triggering physiologic remodeling.[1] Araújo and Lindhe demonstrated that this remodeling results in significant dimensional alterations of the alveolar ridge, particularly during the early post-extraction period.[2]

Several longitudinal studies have shown that horizontal ridge resorption is more pronounced than vertical resorption. Schropp et al. and Tan et al. reported horizontal bone loss ranging from 3–5 mm, predominantly affecting the buccal aspect of the ridge.[3,4]

This is attributed to the thin buccal cortical plate, which is largely composed of bundle bone and is more susceptible to resorption following tooth loss.[5]

Adequate buccolingual ridge width is essential for prosthetically driven implant placement. Benic and Hämmerle reported that insufficient ridge width compromises implant positioning and increases the risk of peri-implant complications.[6] Buser et al. further emphasized that narrow ridges frequently require horizontal augmentation to achieve long-term implant success.[5]

Recipient-site decortication was performed to enhance regenerative outcomes. Urban and Monje advocated decortication as a key step in horizontal guided bone regeneration due to its role in improving graft integration and vascularization.[9] The biological rationale is based on the regional acceleratory phenomenon described by Frost, which involves increased bone turnover and remodeling following surgical insult.[14] Retzepi and Donos reported that cortical perforations facilitate the migration of osteogenic cells and growth factors, thereby enhancing new bone formation.[10]

Calcium phosphor silicate bioactive glass (Nova Bone®) was selected due to its osteoconductive and bioactive properties. Hench described its ability to form a hydroxycarbonate apatite layer that chemically bonds to bone.[12] Xynos et al. demonstrated that ionic dissolution products of bioactive glass stimulate osteoblast activity and angiogenesis.[13]

Compared to autogenous grafts, bioactive glass eliminates donor-site morbidity and reduces surgical time while maintaining satisfactory regenerative potential.[15] Kolerman et al. reported predictable outcomes with alloplastic grafts in ridge augmentation procedures.[11]

The putty formulation offers improved handling and graft stability, particularly advantageous in horizontal ridge augmentation.[16]

In the present case, a 2 mm increase in ridge width was observed at 10 months. Although modest, Wang and Boyapati emphasized that even minimal horizontal augmentation may be clinically decisive in narrow ridges.[7] The ridge width achieved was sufficient to allow implant planning without additional augmentation.

CONCLUSION

Calcium phosphor silicate bioactive glass putty, combined with recipient-site decortication, represents a predictable, minimally invasive approach for horizontal ridge augmentation. Clinical and CBCT findings at 10 months demonstrated satisfactory ridge width gain, supporting its use in the management of narrow alveolar ridges.

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil

References

  1. , , , . Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology (13th ed). St. Louis: Elsevier; .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:212-18.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:313-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 5):1-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? Periodontol 2000. 2017;73:84-102.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Horizontal bone augmentation. J Periodontol. 2014;85:871-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . PASS principle. J Clin Periodontol. 2006;33:89-97.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry In: Wiley-Blackwell (6th ed). .
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Horizontal GBR techniques. J Periodontol. 2019;90:129-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . GBR principles. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2010;1:43-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , . Predictable horizontal ridge augmentation using alloplastic grafts in delayed implant reconstruction procedures. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2018;8:25-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. . Bioactive glass. J Am Ceram Soc. 1991;74:1487-1510.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Ionic products of bioactive glass dissolution increase proliferation of human osteoblasts and induce insulin-like growth factor II mRNA expression and protein synthesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;276:461-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. . Regional acceleratory phenomenon. Orthod Craniofac Res. 1983;15:115-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . Comparison of bioactive glass bone graft substitute with autogenous bone graft in ridge augmentation procedures: a clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:384-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Advances in bioactive glass-containing injectable hydrogel biomaterials for tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2021;136:1-36.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections